Prime Minister Dr Keith Rowley has escaped being sent to the Privileges Committee for his mouth.
In a ruling on Friday, House Speaker Bridgid Annisette-George did not find that a prima facie case had been made out against Rowley.
Opposition Leader Kamla Persad-Bissesar had asked that Rowley be sent to Parliament’s Privileges Committee for recent statements he made.
In October, Persad-Bissessar made the request concerning Rowley’s statements while being interviewed at a public event. She said his statements brought MPs and Parliament staff into disrepute.
Persad-Bissessar had accused Prime Minister Keith Rowley of breaching parliamentary privilege, during the non-ceremonial opening of the new parliamentary session on September 29.
She based her accusations on statements Rowley made to reporters at a health fair at the Diego Martin Boys RC School on September 16.
According to Persad-Bissessar, Rowley told reporters, “If there is wrongdoing, identify the wrongdoing and hold people accountable. I don’t know that we should be overdoing it and I am not afraid of identifying the people I associate with because I do not knowingly associate with crooks except in Parliament.”
She described Rowley’s comments as “intentional, reckless and contemptuous,” and claimed Rowley implied that the Speaker, the Parliament’s staff and MPs, “were not persons who law-abiding citizens should associate with.”
Annisette-George ruled, “While some may find the statement objectionable, it’s insufficient to meet the threshold required to find a prima facie case of a breach of privilege.”
“The statement made is too remote to attribute a reflection on the Members, Presiding Officers or staff of the Parliament. It’s vague, and lacks the specificity required to qualify as a reflection on a Member or on the House.”
“Upon analysis, the statement doesn’t go beyond the realm of political comment, and is too wide to be interpreted by a reasonable person to have brought the Parliament into disrepute.”