Minister signs for demolition …”BATTLE FOR HINDU TEMPLE”

Spread the word
Opposition Leader and attorney, Kamla Persad-Bissessar, has assembled a team of attorneys to fight the State after orders were received to demolish a Hindu Temple in South Oropouche.

A demolition notice was signed by Minister of Planning and Development, Camille Robinson-Regis, for violating Town and Country Planning codes.

The notice, dated April 3, says the temple was not built according to Town and Country codes, and gives Pundit Larry Hasmatally and his family 28 days to demolish the building at Road Reserve, St Mary’s Village, Oropouche.

After Persad-Bissessar heard about the matter, she assembled a team of lawyers who will go to court for an injunction to stop the demolition. That case will be filed shortly, sources say.

Hasmatally said the buildings are not only used as a place of worship but also as a place of refuge for abused and battered women and children.

He asked, “How can they send a letter to demolish a temple? Are there any religious places of worship in this country built to Town and Country specifications?

“When I was growing up, we had a wooden house with a temple to the front that was not really open to members of the public. When I became a pundit, we started breaking pieces of the board house and replacing it with concrete. Little by little, over the last 16 years we were able to build the building you see today.

“We have built a proper drain that the water flows through and we usually keep it covered properly. It is uncovered and cleaned twice a day because we cannot leave it to smell. We have never obstructed the watercourse.”

In a media release on Friday, Robinson-Regis acknowledged that notice had been served on Hasmatally. The release said, “Due to the egregious breaches carried out on the site, the Honourable Minister agreed to enforcement action and the respective enforcement notices were served by registered mail on April 03, 2018. Construction of a structural addition continued unabated despite the issuance of a letter of advice and the refusal of planning permission between 2016 to present.”

“The building did not exist for 50 years, but has only existed on the site for two years. This structural addition is the building that is subject to enforcement, NOT the temple.”

The release stated that in 2014, the division received a complaint from a member of the public. In 2016 an investigation was launched and found there were three established structures on the property, with a three-storey additional structure under construction.

The release said although the other structures were not in compliance with Town and Country approvals, the only structure against which a complaint was lodged was the three-storey building.

Inline image
LARRY HASMATALLY
Inline image
THE HINDU TEMPLE

Related Posts

“Murder, murder everywhere”
Economic hardships continue as mid-year review looms
Imbert tries to spin absence …”WHY ROWLEY BLANKED BRITISH PM”

Leave a Reply